Thursday, August 11, 2011

The rise and fall of Harlem: the conspiracy to retake Harlem. Fact or Fiction? Part five

This will be a sought of pre-recap/summary before I conclude this series in the next and final part. (Part 6) so the bottom line is this, like it or not, black people were not brought over to America in slave ships to be producers for themselves (or ourselves). No, instead we were brought over here to the HELLS of North America to be producers for white America. We were not brought over here to help the Native Americans. We brought over here to be fools and tools for white America. Surely you didn't think that the enemy brought us 9,000 miles from Africa to America so he could help us open up a steak and take, or a boutique or to help us get a SBA loan so we may do for self. And this is not hate or rhetoric; this is the un-disputable, in-refutable un-deniable fact, proof and history of our sojourn in America.

  • From the author Samuel Goode in his book entitled "Turning to the south" he states the following: "and all the gold mines of the world have not produced enough gold in 500 years to pay for thirty crops of the south's cotton, and all the silver mines of the world for same 500 years produced $500,000,000 less than the value of the south's thirty years cotton crop."
  • From the Atlanta Constitution it calculated that the thirty years after emancipation " the nations cotton crop generated nearly $8.5 billion (now worth $224 Billion) nearly triple the amount of money generated from the production of gold and silver in the united states in the previous century"

So from the above two examples is why we were brought over here to make others rich. Simple and plain.

It is stated that history repeats its self, for those who don't learn. It is also said or stated that the present is built off of yesterday and tomorrow is built on today. And last but not least it is also stated that there is nothing new under the sun, what was done yesterday will be done today. But before I continue let me call some witnesses to the witness stand, and let's see if we can "do the math "as we say. Basically meaning, let's see if can add everything together and see what the sum or total is today.

  • From author Kenneth Stampp in his book entitled " The Era of Reconstruction, 1865-1877 " he states the following: " the purpose of Jim Crow was to keep the negro ( that's you black people in case you didn't know), as long as possible, exactly what he was, a property-less rural laborer under strict controls, without political rights, and with inferior legal rights." (also see William Cohen "At Freedoms Edge: Black Mobility and the Southern White Quest for Racial Control" , 1861-1915 and also David Brown and Clive Webb "Race in the American South: from Slavery to Civil Rights)
  • From the author Williamson "After Slavery" and author Durrill " The south Carolina black code " they state the following: (or reported the following) " one planter reminded the framers (of the new black codes) that freed black people should be prohibited from ever owning real estate and the very idea of land ownership should never cross the their minds
  • From the author Juliet Walker in her book entitled "The History Black Business in America: Capitalism, Race, Entrepreneurship", states the following: "the negroes…. Keep a large amount of money in circulation in the country, and consume on a much larger scale than formerly, which makes the business of supplying them as lucrative, if not more so, then planting or renting"

So looking at the above is it coincidence that black farm owners/operators in south only own 1.49 million acres of land, down from 15 million acres of land in the 1920's. (see African American Rural Land Wealth: The Crisis and the Opportunities", Prof. Thomas Mitchell, Univ. of Wisconsin Law School) in the book it also states that some of the problems black farm owners face is (1) denial of credit and (2) high predatory loans.

And what about the inferior legal rights? This is from the department of Justice:


 

"Among Federal offenders sentenced under guide lines from January 20, 1989, to June 30, 1990, there were substantial aggregate differences in sentences imposed on white, black, and Hispanic offenders. During this period, 85% of Hispanic offenders and 78%of black offenders were sentenced to imprisonment, compared with 72%of white offenders. On average, black offenders sentenced to prison during this period had imposed sentences that were 41% longer than for whites (21months longer). For incarcerated Hispanics, the average imposed sentence did not differ significantly from the average sentence for whites." (see U.S. department of Justice: office of justice programs Bureau of justice statistics: sentencing in federal courts: does race matters.)


 

And last but not least, black spending power in America is According to a survey: black buying power is estimated now at about $913 billion and is projected to increase to $1.2 trillion by 2013.
A similar study released in November by the Selig Center at the University of Georgia estimated that black buying power would be about $1.1 trillion by 2014, with current spending power for blacks at about $910 billion.


 


 


 


 


 


 

No comments:

Post a Comment